n
this interview, Dr. Guido Kroemer talks with Special Topics
about his highly cited work in apoptosis research. A recent
survey by Special Topics shows that Dr. Kroemer is among the
top 10 researchers in this field, with 115 papers cited a
total of 8,052 times. In ISI
Essential
Science Indicators
Web product, Dr. Kroemer’s work can be found in the fields
of Clinical Medicine, Biology & Biochemistry, and
Immunology. Dr. Kroemer is a Research Director at the Institut
Gustave-Roussy in Villejuif, France.
|
What
factors or circumstances led you to your work?
I have been interested in the biochemical mechanisms of apoptosis
since I started working on peripheral T-cell tolerance, in 1990 (in
Madrid, Spain). One key observation was that even in conditions in
which mouse splenic T-cell subpopulations become drastically reduced
in number, no signs of classical apoptosis (such as chromatin
condensation and DNA fragmentation) could be detected in vivo.
This led me to search for novel biochemical markers of ongoing
apoptosis in vivo, once I moved to Villejuif, on the
outskirts of Paris, at the end of 1993. It was at the end of 1993
that we found that one distinctive feature of early cell death was a
loss of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential. It then took us a
little bit more than one year to establish that mitochondrial
failure is a near-to-universal feature of early cell death, and in
1995 my group was the first to formulate the hypothesis that
permeabilization of mitochondrial membranes would be a decisive step
in apoptosis (J. Exp. Med. 181 (1995): 1661-1672; J. Exp.
Med. 182 (1995): 367-377; FASEB. J. 9 (1995):
1277-1287). We subsequently reported strong experimental evidence in
favor of the implication of mitochondria in apoptosis, using novel
cell-free systems, showing that mitochondria release apoptogenic
factors during apoptosis and that "mitochondrial membrane
permeabilization" (MMP) is under the control of Bcl-2-like
oncoproteins. Although the hypothesis that mitochondria regulate
apoptosis initially met general incredulity, today, in May 2002,
more that 4,200 articles contain the two keywords
"mitochondria" and "apoptosis" in the Medline
bibliography database. According to current understanding, in most
paradigms of apoptotic cell death, MMP is a rate-limiting step in
the sequence of biochemical evidence leading to cellular demise. By
analogy to cell cycle control, MMP can be considered as (one of) the
checkpoint(s) regulating cell death.
What
are your immediate and long-term research goals?
Obviously, we are interested in the fine mechanisms of
mitochondrial apoptosis. So, we would like to understand the
detailed molecular mechanisms accounting for MMP, both in health and
in disease. In particular, we are interested in how MMP contributes
to cell death induced by the human immunodeficiency virus, how MMP
contributes to illicit neuronal cell death, and how anti-cancer
chemotherapy elicits MMP. We are also wondering how the resistance
of mitochondria to MMP can explain the resistance of cancer cells to
apoptosis induction, and we hope to develop strategies for
overcoming chemotherapy resistance by targeting tumor mitochondria.
In addition, we are intrigued by the mode of action of one
particular apoptogenic factor released from mitochondria that we
discovered and baptized "apoptosis inducing factor", AIF.
AIF is phylogenetically conserved (which is not the case for
caspases), and it is involved in the very first wave of
morphogenetic cell death of the mouse embryo, as shown by knockout
studies. We would like to dissect the mechanisms through which AIF
translocates to the nucleus and causes chromatin condensation and
degradation.
So in a way, we are attempting to follow up our initial
discoveries, and to apply these findings to the comprehension of
major apoptosis-related diseases including cancer and AIDS.
Nonetheless, we would also like to tackle a few of the truly
fundamental questions in cell death research; for instance, on the
molecular links between different types of cell death such as
apoptosis, autophagic cell death, senescence, and mitotic
catastrophe. It is my intimate conviction that resolving fundamental
issues has much higher prospects of application than research
designed to be applied from the very beginning. I do hope that, in
spite of the general conjecture, both the national and European
funding agencies will allow me to proceed in accord with m y
convictions.
What
are the social implications of your work, if any?
The notion that MMP would
constitute an apoptotic checkpoint proved to be operative for
applied biomedical science in the sense that:
 |
Detection
of MMP has become a surrogate marker of cell death. |
 |
MMP
is locally regulated at the level of mitochondrial membranes
by several oncogene products, in particular the anti-apoptotic
proteins of the Bcl-2 family. |
 |
Several
genetically determined diseases associated with cell loss, in
particular neurodegenerative diseases, have been linked to
mutations in mitochondrial proteins. |
 |
Some
intracellular parasites (viruses and bacteria) including
several major pathogens such as human immunodeficiency
virus-1, hepatitis B virus, or influenza virus, regulate MMP
by producing proteins which target mitochondria. |
 |
Several
cytotoxic compounds (toxins and drugs) induce MMP in a direct
fashion, that is, via a direct action on mitochondria. |
 |
Induction
of MMP by drugs specifically designed to target mitochondrial
receptors (proteins or lipids) turned out to be efficient in
the experimental treatment of cancers. |
 |
Several
cytoprotective drugs directly act on mitochondria to prevent
MMP, and such drugs are useful for the prevention of acute
cell death in several experimental paradigms of acute cell
death, e.g. in ischemic reperfusion damage of the heart or of
the brain. |
As a result, it appears likely that
pharmacological interventions on MMP will be taken advantage of to
suppress unwarranted cell death and to enforce cell death in tumor
cells. So research on MMP is relevant to several diseases with a
major socioeconomic impact.
What
tools or technological advances have been important in your research,
if any?
Technological advance has been
instrumental for our research, at many levels. On the one hand, we
developed a whole series of techniques in our laboratory. This
applies to cytofluorometric staining protocols allowing for the
monitoring of mitochondrial change at the single-cell or
single-organelle level, as well as to the development of cell-free
assays allowing for the direct assessment of apoptosis-related
changes in isolated mitochondria and nuclei. On the other hand, we
profited from the general technological advancement using, for
instance, advanced proteomics approaches for our research.
Did
you expect your work to become highly cited, or is this surprising to
you?
We (myself and my collaborators Dr.
Zamzami and Dr. Susin, who also figure in the list of the 25
most-cited apoptosis researchers) did expect, indeed, as early as in
1995 that our work would be highly cited. We also anticipated that a
large number of groups would move into the field of mitochondrial
apoptosis, given the importance of the phenomenon. To paraphrase the
German philosopher Schopenhauer, a truth, once discovered, is first
ridiculed, then violently opposed, and finally considered as
trivial. This is exactly what has been happening to the discovery
that MMP controls apoptosis. Many groups on mitochondrial regulation
of apoptosis do not even cite our initial work any more but instead
cite more recent technological papers or general reviews.
How
rapidly has the state of our knowledge about your field evolved in the
past decade, and what were the key discoveries that furthered the
advancement of the field?
Advances in the field of apoptosis
have been breathtaking over the last 10 years. In as little as 10
years many of the key components of the death regulatory machinery
have been discovered, ranging from Fas/Apo-1/CD95-like death
receptors to caspases and caspase activators. For our own studies,
Xiaodong Wang's work showing that cytochrome c release from
mitochondria leads to caspase activation has been most stimulating.
It has also been very important that many signal transduction
pathways have been connected to MMP and apoptosis control, both in
health and in death. There were
so many key discoveries in this vast area of research that it is
impossible to enumerate them all.
What
is your prediction for the state of our knowledge about your field
10 years from now?
Ten years ago we knew near-to-nothing on cell death. Today we
understand (or we believe to understand) the basic processes
through which apoptosis is controlled and executed. An optimistic
prediction is to assume that disease-related disorders in
apoptosis control will be elucidated in some detail and that
specific therapeutic interventions on apoptosis will be developed.
It is reasonable to believe that therapeutic interventions on
apoptotic checkpoints (including MMP) will become clinically
useful within the next 10 years. Another prediction for the next
decade is to assume that apoptosis will be regarded as a
phenomenon as trivial as the cell cycle, namely a basic biological
phenomenon regulated by the general cellular context. So
relatively few researchers will continue to work on the cell
biology of apoptosis in a dedicated fashion.
Would
you like to leave any other comments about your work or share a
personal side of yourself?
I would like to acknowledge the institutional support by the
French National Research Council (CNRS), the French Medical
Research Council (INSERM), the National Agency for AIDS Research (ANRS),
the National League against Cancer (LNC), and the Institut
Gustave-Roussy (IGR) which has been a conditio sine qua non
for our success.
Guido Kroemer, M.D., Ph.D.
Institut Gustave-Roussy
Villejuif, France
|
ESI Special Topics,
June 2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/apoptosis/interviews/DrGuidoKroemer.html
|
|