An INTERVIEW with
Andreas Ringwald
ESI Special Topics, March
2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/blackholes/interviews/AndreasRingwald.html
ccording
to our listing of the top 20 papers published over the past
two years in black hole research, the #4 slot belongs to the
paper "Collider versus cosmic ray sensitivity to black
hole production," (Physics Letters B 525:135-42,
2002), which has garnered 48 citations to date. In the
interview below, lead author Andreas Ringwald discusses how
the paper came about and what role it has played in the field.
Ringwald is a member of the Theory Group at Deutsches
Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY) in Hamburg, Germany.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
It deals with a very interesting and timely topic. Black holes
are among the most remarkable, but also most mysterious objects in
physic s. Since Hawking's
prediction that black holes are not completely black, but evaporate by
particle radiation, they play an important role in any attempt towards
a theory of quantum gravity.
|

“Black holes are among the most remarkable, but also most mysterious objects in physics.”
|
|
Unfortunately, experimental detection of Hawking radiation from
real, massive astrophysical black holes seems impossible, since the
corresponding temperature, as seen by an outside observer, is tiny,
e.g. 10^{-7} Kelvin for a solar mass black hole. For comparison, the
temperature of the cosmic microwave background photons—the relic
radiation from the big bang—is 2.7 Kelvin and thus 10 million
times larger.
This is different for hypothetical microscopic black holes: they
would evaporate within a very short time in a particle radiation
flash. According to the Standard Model of particle physics, such
microscopic black holes can be produced in principle in particle
scattering experiments with center-of-mass energies of order 10^{19}
GeV, about 15 orders of magnitude larger than what will be available
at the CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in around 2007.
Recently, however, it was pointed out that in extensions of the
Standard Model of particle physics, which involve, in addition to
the usual three spatial dimensions, a number of extra spatial
dimensions in which gravity can act, above-microscopic black hole
production may occur copiously already at center-of-mass energies
available at the LHC or in cosmic ray and neutrino interactions.
Therefore, if these extensions of the Standard Model are right,
they open a window to study black hole production and evaporation
experimentally for the first time and within the next decade.
What
are the circumstances which led you to your work?
In May 2001, my graduate student Huitzu Tu started to work on her
Ph.D. thesis, "Ultrahigh energy cosmic neutrinos and physics
beyond the Standard Model," under my supervision. The intention
of her thesis was and still is to explore the possibilities of
studying exotic processes beyond the Standard Model at cosmic ray
facilities such as the Pierre Auger Observatory and neutrino
telescopes such as AMANDA/IceCube, complementary to laboratory
studies at the LHC.
The seminal papers of Dimopoulos
& Landsberg and Giddings & Thomas on black hole production
at the LHC appeared on the ArXiv in June 2001, the paper of Feng
& Shapere on the detection possibility at the Pierre Auger
Observatory for cosmic rays in September 2001. Huitzu and I were
just perfectly prepared to also make a significant contribution in
this field.
Would you describe the significance of this work for your field?
Apart from improving the expected event rate estimates in
comparison to Feng & Shapere by taking into account more recent
estimates of the flux of cosmic neutrinos impinging on the Earth's
atmosphere, we presented the first limits on black hole production
and thus on extensions of the Standard Model with extra spatial
dimensions from the non-observation of black hole-initiated air
showers by the Fly's Eye cosmic ray collaboration.
Where has this research gone since the publication of your paper?
Where do you see it going 10 years from now?
Even stronger constraints on black hole production arising from
the non-observation of black hole-initiated air showers by the AGASA
cosmic ray collaboration have been worked out (Anchordoqui, Feng,
Goldberg, and Shapere).
Recently, we have derived strict lower bounds on the cosmic
neutrino flux (Fodor, Katz, A.R., Tu) which are presently exploited
to derive very robust cosmic ray constraints to black hole
production (Anchordoqui, Fodor, Katz, A.R., Tu, in preparation).
In 10 years, we should know whether such extensions of the
Standard Model with large extra spatial dimensions are realized in
Nature, both from laboratory experiments (LHC) as well as from
cosmic ray and neutrino observatories (Auger, IceCube).
Andreas Ringwald
DESY
Hamburg, Germany
|
ESI Special Topics,
March 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/blackholes/interviews/AndreasRingwald.html
|
|
|