Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
Thomson
Essential Science Indicators - Special Topics  RSS feeds for the editorial Web sites of Essential Science Indicators.
All Topics Menu
Help || About || Contact

  
|  Previous Page  |
  |  Special Topics Menu  |  |  Next Page  |
  

ESI Special Topic of:
"Breast Cancer (2005)," Published July 2005

•> Search Special Topics
Breast Cancer (2005) Menu

Breast Cancer

An INTERVIEW with Professor Bruce Ponder

ESI Special Topics, August 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/breast-cancer2005/interviews/BrucePonder.html

In the interview below, Professor Bruce Ponder talks about his highly cited work in breast cancer research. According to our Special Topic on breast cancer, Professor Ponder’s work ranks at #5, with 91 papers cited a total of 7,665 times, and five of these papers appearing in the top 20 list on our analysis. In the ISI Essential Science Indicators Web product, Professor Ponder’s record includes 110 papers cited a total of 5,056 times to date in the field of Clinical Medicine, and 34 papers cited a total of 3,809 times to date in the field of Molecular Biology & Genetics. Professor Ponder is a Principal Investigator in the Department of Oncology at the Hutchinson/MRC Research Centre in Cambridge, England.

ST:  Why would you say your work is highly cited?


“The big goal for the next 10 years is to elucidate the 'genetic architecture' of the common cancers.”

The search for the highly penetrant predisposing genes BRCA1 and 2, and subsequently for common low penetrance variants, has been a very active field of research over the last 10 years. My group, together with collaborators, was particularly well-placed to contribute because we combined each of the elements necessary for such work—epidemiology, with large well-described patient populations; molecular genetics for genotyping; statistics; and a clinical base, which is important when seeking to involve large numbers of patients and families in genetic research.

ST:  What are the circumstances which led you to your work?

I was led into the genetics of cancer by seeing patients with familial thyroid cancer when I was practicing as an oncologist in 1980. I was aware of the beginnings of genetic linkage using DNA polymorphisms, and I realized that the study of familial cancers would be one way to identify predisposing genes, and thus bring insights into how cancers develop. My initial work was with thyroid cancer in MEN2, but subsequently I extended that to breast and ovarian cancer.

ST:  How would you describe the significance of this work for your field?

The identification of strongly predisposing genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, to which my group contributed, has provided insights into cancer cell biology. We constructed a transgenic mouse with a hypomorphic BRCA2 allele, which was the starting point for the work of Venkitaraman’s group in elucidating many features of the BRCA2 function. In the clinic, after initial anxieties about the effects of giving a genetic diagnosis, it has turned out that BRCA1/2 genetic testing has greatly assisted the clinical management of the families in which these mutations can be identified. The majority of genetic predisposition to cancer, however, is the result of the combined effect of low-penetrance genetic variants. As these are identified over the next several years, we can expect more insights into biology, and eventually perhaps the possibility of targeting interventions to the highest-risk groups.

ST:  How much has this research advanced since you first started publishing on it?

When I first started publishing in cancer genetics, none of the predisposing genes had been identified. Now there are many high-penetrance genes, and the search for low-penetrance variants is well under way. This has all been driven by technological advances in DNA analysis, and more recently by the genome project. With it has come a predominant genetic perspective in thinking about cancer which was absent 30 years ago.

ST:  Where do you see this research going 10 years from now?

The big goal for the next 10 years is to elucidate the "genetic architecture" of the common cancers. That is, what is the mix of common and rare, and strong and weak, germline genetic variants involved with susceptibility? This mix will determine how easy the variants are to identify, and how quickly we can expect this type of genetic information to find practical application.End

Professor Bruce Ponder, FRS
Cancer Research UK Department of Oncology
Hutchison/MRC Research Centre
Cambridge, England

ESI Special Topics, August 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/breast-cancer2005/interviews/BrucePonder.html

This special topic of breast cancer was originally featured in ESI Topics in July 2001. To view the archived breast cancer topic, click here.

ESI Special Topic of:
"Breast Cancer (2005)," Published July 2005

•> Search Special Topics
Breast Cancer (2005) Menu || All Topics Menu ||
Interview Index
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.