Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
Thomson
Essential Science Indicators - Special Topics  RSS feeds for the editorial Web sites of Essential Science Indicators.
All Topics Menu
Help || About || Contact

  
|  Previous Page  |
  |  Special Topics Menu  |  |  Next Page  |
  

ESI Special Topic of:
"Coral Reef Ecology," Published September 2004

•> Search Special Topics
Coral Reef Ecology Menu

Coral Reef Ecology

An ESSAY by Julian Caley, Ph.D.

ESI Special Topics, December 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/coralreef/interviews/JulianCaley.html

In the essay below, Dr. Julian Caley discusses his highly cited work in coral reef ecology. According to our Special Topic on this research area, Dr. Caley’s work ranks at #10, with 13 papers cited a total of 416 times. Dr. Caley’s most-cited paper, "Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations," (Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27:477-500, 1996), ranks at #2 on our list of highly cited papers over the past decade with 244 citations to date. In the ISI Essential Science Indicators Web product, Dr. Caley’s work can be found in the field of Environment/Ecology. Dr. Caley is the Group Leader of the Conservation and Biodiversity Group at the Australian Institute of Marine Science.

My original interest in coral reef ecosystems was focussed on the structure and dynamics of populations and communities of tropical reef fishes. These interests centred on recruitment, predation, disturbance, and habitat structure. Because reef populations and communities are replenished, for the most part, by settlement from the plankton, a debate had developed in the literature regarding the importance of presettlement versus postsettlement processes in tropical and temperate marine populations with open demographics. My research indicated to me that, across geographic spatial scales, the relative importance of these processes varied from place to place. This observation, coupled with insights I gained from Prof. A.R.E. Sinclair (University of British Columbia), and his research on terrestrial population dynamics, stimulated the idea for a review of the dynamics of demographically open marine populations. The group of us that assembled to write this review brought expertise in temperate and tropical systems, and from sessile invertebrates to fishes. By applying to open marine systems population dynamics theory and principles developed for closed terrestrial populations, we were able to demonstrate that the debate about whether recruitment or some postrecruitment process drives the dynamics of the open, marine populations was unnecessary. In nearly every case, the dynamics of these systems could be expected to result from a combination of processes operating both before and after settlement to benthic habitats. This review appears to have facilitated a shift away from these polarized views of marine population dynamics toward a better appreciation of the relative importance of these different processes in generating observed patterns of abundance.


“…understanding evolutionary processes in tropical marine systems is important in its own right, and the high diversity of these systems provide great opportunities to design new and powerful tests with the potential to shed new light on long-standing issues.”

The integration of processes operating at large scales, both spatial and temporal, and how they influence local patterns and processes continues to dominate my research. At large spatial scales, I have studied local-regional diversity relationships both in tropical reef species and global patterns of biodiversity. My co-authors and I have shown patterns of regional enrichment of local biodiversity, which are remarkably consistent across major taxa (e.g., including trees, freshwater fishes, terrestrial mammals, and birds) and continents with vastly different histories (e.g., North America and Australia). I have also investigated patterns of rarity in reef fishes. While our understanding of rarity is well advanced for terrestrial species, our understanding of rarity and commonness in marine species is comparatively poor. Not only is it important to understand these issues for marine taxa, marine taxa can provide independent tests of theory developed with terrestrial taxa in mind.

In addition to the effects of regional processes on local ecology being poorly understood in marine ecosystems, the roles of historical processes in these systems have not been adequately researched. As with rarity, understanding evolutionary processes in tropical marine systems is important in its own right, and the high diversity of these systems provide great opportunities to design new and powerful tests with the potential to shed new light on long-standing issues. Three examples from my recent research illustrate this point. 1) For more than three decades, ecologists and evolutionary biologists have sought, without success, evidence that the high performance of resource specialists on a limited range of resources trades off against lower average performance of generalists across a broader resource-use spectrum. Using coral-dwelling gobies which display interspecific variation in habitat specialization, we were able to show that indeed the jack-of–all-trades-is-master-of-none by transplanting gobies between coral species and estimating their growth performance. 2) The evolution of a Batesian mimic to resemble its model species has generally been thought to require a large initial improvement in resemblance occurring in a large, single step, to overcome costs of increased conspicuousness. Using a model-mimic pair of tropical reef fish species, we were able to demonstrate that small improvements in resemblance can instead be associated with increased fitness suggesting that Batesian mimicry could evolve gradually. 3) Since the late 1970s, allocation to reproduction was thought to be optimised as a two-stage process: first total reproductive effort is optimised, then offspring size is optimised and traded off against fecundity (i.e., the Smith and Fretwell model). One implication of this view is that reproductive effort and offspring size will evolve independently. Theoretically at least, offspring size and total reproductive effort might not evolve independently (e.g., the Winkler and Wallin model). We were able to test this idea and show correlated evolution of reproductive effort and offspring size using a comparative analysis of copepod life histories that included 105 families of copepods.

My current research continues to range from population and community dynamics through to macroecology and evolution of reef species with a particular emphasis on the evolution of these organisms in the face of climate change.End

Julian Caley, Ph.D.
Australian Institute of Marine Science
Townsville, Queensland, Australia

ESI Special Topics, December 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/coralreef/interviews/JulianCaley.html

ESI Special Topic of:
"Coral Reef Ecology," Published September 2004

•> Search Special Topics
Coral Reef Ecology Menu || All Topics Menu ||
Interview Index
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.