How
would you characterize your general research area?
I’m a clinical investigator predominantly involved with
randomized clinical trials in venous thromboembolism, particularly
relating to treatment and diagnosis. Venous thromboembolism
encompasses deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolisms. Deep vein
thromboses are clots or blockages that occur in the deep veins,
usually of the legs. When clots occur in the legs they can break
free and travel with the blood to the right side of the heart, and
then through the heart into the lung, where they lodge and are then
referred to as pulmonary embolisms. Deep vein thrombosis usually
presents as pain and swelling in the legs. Standard treatment is
with anticoagulant therapy, initially low molecular weight or
unfractionated heparin by injection for about a week, followed by
warfarin therapy (or another vitamin K antagonist) for three to six
months, and in some cases longer.
|

|
|
One of the major changes that we’re about to see is the introduction of new anticoagulant therapies to treat venous thrombosis and other thrombotic conditions. These new drugs have the potential to change the future of anticoagulant therapy, enabling venous thrombosis to be treated much more conveniently without the need for injections or blood sampling for laboratory monitoring.
|
|
Some people with clots in their legs are not diagnosed, either
because the clots are missed or, more often, because the clots in
the legs are asymptomatic. These persons may subsequently present
with symptoms of pulmonary embolism such as shortness of breath,
chest pains, coughing up blood and, sometimes, dizziness or
irregular heartbeat. Pulmonary embolism is usually treated the same
way as deep vein thrombosis.
The type of research that I mostly perform is randomized clinical
trials in which different approaches to diagnoses or treatments are
compared. My area of particular interest has been in the optimal
duration of treatment of venous thromboembolism with warfarin
therapy. In these studies, alternative lengths of treatment are
compared in different groups of patients with venous thromboembolism
to determine if one duration is associated with better long-term
outcomes for patients.
How
long have you been working in this area, and how did you become
interested in it?
I have been working in this area for 10 years having originally
trained as a respirologist and exercise physiologist. Initially, I
was attracted to the possibility of examining pulmonary and leg
muscle function in patients with previous pulmonary embolisms and
venous thrombosis. My M.B. is from Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland,
in 1980. My Ph.D. is from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario,
in 1992.
What
were or are some of the greatest challenges in performing your work?
Most of the trials I’ve been involved with have been
multi-center clinical trials so I am dependent on working with a
network of colleagues. In that regard, I have been fortunate, as
there is a tradition of doing that kind of work in Hamilton and
across Canada. I have been able to avail myself of a research
infrastructure that has been established and built upon over the
last 30 years. I work with like-minded people who attach a high
importance to doing clinical research and doing it well. Common to
all areas of research, there is the ongoing challenge of obtaining
funding to study the questions that are considered important.
How
rapidly has the state of knowledge in your field evolved in the last
decade, and what were some of the key discoveries that furthered that
advancement?
The research I’ve been involved with often has been refining
how to use drugs that have been available for decades. For instance,
warfarin and heparin have been in use clinically for over 50 years
and many of the studies I’ve been involved with have been designed
to improve how we use those drugs. One of the major changes that we’re
about to see is the introduction of new anticoagulant therapies to
treat venous thrombosis and other thrombotic conditions. These new
drugs have the potential to change the future of anticoagulant
therapy, enabling venous thrombosis to be treated much more
conveniently without the need for injections or blood sampling for
laboratory monitoring. On the diagnostic side, there have been major
improvements in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary
embolism including clinical assessment of pre-test probability, D-dimer
testing, and CT and MRI scanning.
What
is the implication of your work for the future of your field and
related fields?
I think that we will continue to improve how we use currently
available drugs and will learn how best to use the new drugs that
have yet to be introduced into clinical practice. Based on the work
we have done over the past five years there have already been
changes in how we use warfarin to treat venous thromboembolism. Some
of the principles that we have learned from these studies are also
expected to be relevant to how we will use the new anticoagulant
therapies. For example, we should be in a better position to
identify patients with a high risk of thrombosis who require
long-term treatment and, conversely, to recognize which patients
have such a low risk of recurrent thrombosis that long-term
treatment is not indicated.
Where
do you predict the state of knowledge in your field will be in 10
years?
Hopefully, drugs that we currently use will be replaced by new
drugs that are more convenient, safer, and even more effective. This
would enable more extensive use of antithrombotic therapy for
primary and secondary prevention of venous and arterial
thromboembolism.
What
advice would you give to those entering a clinical research career in
general?
Work with a productive group and an experienced and committed
mentor who attaches a high priority to you becoming a successful
independent investigator. It is a bonus if you can work on topics
that you are enthusiastic about—however, this can wait until after
you become established. It is also important to spend an adequate
initial amount of time in training to acquire the skills that will
be required for a successful career in research.
What
would you like the general public to understand about your work?
That it is designed to improve clinical management of patients
who present with either suspected deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary
embolism and, having made a diagnosis, to improve the treatment of
such patients. Also, this kind of research is dependent on patients
participating in trials. My experience has been that there is a
great willingness among patients to enroll in trials, even when
there can be no gain for that individual patient; instead, there is
the hope of improving things for other patients in the future. I’m
very appreciative of this commitment from patients who often are
already trying to cope with illness.
Clive Kearon MB MRCP(I) FRCP(C) PhD
Associate Professor of Medicine, McMaster University
and
Head, Clinical Thrombosis Service
Henderson General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada