By John N. Bahcall
ESI Special Topics, June 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2003/june03-JohnBahcall.html
|
John N. Bahcall answers a
few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in the field of
Physics.
From
•>>June 2003
Field: Physics
Article Title: "Before and after: how has the SNO neutral current measurement changed things? - art. no. 054"
Authors: Bahcall,
JN;Gonzalez-Garcia, CM;Pena-Garay, C
Journal: JHEP, 07(2002)054 (August 6, 2002), hep-ph/0204314
* Inst Adv Study, Sch Nat Sci, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA.
* Inst Adv Study, Sch Nat Sci, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA.
* CERN, Div Theory, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland.
* SUNY Stony Brook, YITP, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
* Univ Valencia, CSIC, IFIC, Valencia 46071, Spain.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
The main reason that our paper is highly cited is that the
SNO collaboration provided fundamental new data that made
possible some remarkable inferences, including the results that
the observed total 8B neutrino flux from the Sun is in excellent
agreement with the predicted standard solar model neutrino flux
and that the neutrino flavor oscillations are unambiguously
observed for solar neutrinos. The fact that the SNO
collaboration generously made their data available in a
convenient form, with full explanations of how to use those
data, permitted us and other theoretical groups to quickly and
effectively utilize the data for a variety of different
applications. The collaborations for other important solar
neutrino experiments performed earlier have similarly made their
data available in convenient form. These include the Kamiokande
and Super-Kamiokande experiments in Japan, the SAGE data from
Russia, the GALLEX obtained in the Gran Sasso underground
laboratory in Italy , and the original chlorine data obtained in
the Homestake Gold Mine in South Dakota, US. Progress in the
field of solar neutrino research is obtained through a community
activity, with mutually supportive interactions between
different experimental groups and between theorists and
experimentalists. I should also mention that writing this paper
was a wonderful experience for me since I got to work with
Carlos Pena-Garay and his thesis advisor, Concha
Gonzalez-Garcia. They are both outstanding scientists, who work
very hard (and as far as I can tell, never sleep), and really
fun people. I learned an enormous amount by collaborating with
them.
Does
it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to
others?
Yes, we introduced several technical improvements in the
analysis procedures for studying solar neutrino oscillations. In
addition, I think our results were of special interest because
we provided detailed predictions with uncertainties for 10
observables that can be measured in future solar neutrino
experiments. These predictions are based upon our analyses of
all of the existing solar and reactor data.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's
terms?
Our paper made use of recently published data from the
Sudbury Neutron Observatory in Sudbury, Ontario and from other
observatories located deep underground around the world in order
to study neutrinos from the Sun. Neutrinos are exotic particles
produced in nuclear processes that are uncharged, almost
massless, that travel close to the speed of light, and interact
very little with matter. They can be used to look inside the Sun
and to observe the nuclear reactions that take place in the very
center of the Sun. The nuclear reactions supply the sunshine
that is responsible for all life on Earth. The new data led to
two especially important conclusions. One, neutrinos change
their type on the way to the Earth from the interior of the Sun.
This result means that the standard model of particle physics
must be modified to include the possibility of neutrinos
changing their types. Second, the total flux of neutrinos
observed from the Sun is in excellent agreement with theoretical
calculations of the predicted flux based upon a detailed model
of how the temperature, density, and chemical composition of the
interior of the Sun interact. The agreement between the
predicted and the observed flux means that astrophysicists
understand well how the Sun shines.
How
did you become involved in this research?
I began this research in 1961, when Raymond
Davis Jr. asked me if I could calculate the rate at which
neutrinos from 7Be would be produced at typical solar
temperatures. I did this calculation and only afterwards
realized that I needed a detailed model of the Sun in order to
really answer the question. I got deeper and deeper into the
problem, and more than 40 years later I am still fascinated by
questions concerning neutrinos and stars. Right now, I am
working hard trying to answer the question of what can be
learned from future experiments.
John N. Bahcall
Institute for Advanced Study
School of Natural Sciences
Princeton, NJ, USA
Prof. Concha Gonzalez-Garcia
CN Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics
State University of New York at Stony Brook
Stony Brook, NY, USA
Related
features:

Dr. John N. Bahcall is
listed in the rankings of the Special Topic Neutrinos, in
the Top 25 Papers (#3,
#8, #9, and #16), and also is among the Top 25 Authors in both number
of papers and cites per
paper.


Read a classic
Science Watch® interview with
John
N. Bahcall.
|
ESI Special Topics, June 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2003/june03-JohnBahcall.html
|
|
|