|
Richard York answers a
few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in the field of
Social Sciences, general.
From
•>>April 2005
Field:
Social Sciences, general
Article Title: Footprints on the earth: The environmental consequences of modernity
Authors: York,
R;Rosa, EA;Dietz, T
Journal: AMER SOCIOL REV
Volume: 68
Page: 279-300
Year: APR 2003
* Univ Oregon, Dept Sociol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA.
* Univ Oregon, Dept Sociol, Eugene, OR 97403 USA.
* Washington State Univ, Pullman, WA 99164 USA.
* Michigan State Univ, Environm Sci & Policy Program, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
|

“...our analysis is informed by sociological and ecological theory and assesses the effects of a variety of factors on the “ecological footprints” of societies in a rigorous manner.”
|
|
I suspect that our paper is highly cited because it addresses
one of the most important topics of the 21st century: the human
factors that drive environmental degradation. Furthermore, our
analysis is informed by sociological and ecological theory and
assesses the effects of a variety of factors on the
"ecological footprints" of societies in a rigorous
manner.
Does
it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to
others?
We do not report a singularly new discovery, but, rather,
refine existing theories by more precisely assessing how
demographic, economic, and other forces influence the scale of
human pressure on ecosystems. We do use a new statistical
approach, which may have broad applicability, to assessing how
human factors influence the environment. This approach was
originally developed by my coauthors, Eugene Rosa and Thomas
Dietz, and is based on an ecological model (I=PAT) that has
served as a basis for environmental debates since the 1970s. We
also analyze a new indicator of the impact of societies on the
environment, the "ecological footprint"—originally
developed by William Rees and Mathis Wackernagel at the
University of British Columbia—which previously had not been
examined in a similarly rigorous manner.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
Our main finding is that nations’ ecological footprints are
largely determined by the size of their populations and their
level of material affluence (measured as per capita GDP). In
particular, national ecological footprints are roughly
proportional to population size, all else being equal, and,
contrary to the claims of many neoclassical economists and
modernization theorists, the ecological footprint rises steadily
with economic development, showing no sign of leveling off or
declining in the wealthiest nations. These results suggest that
we are unlikely to obtain ecological sustainability by
continuing to pursue endless economic growth and ignoring
population growth, while hoping for a technological fix to solve
our problems.
How
did you become involved in this research?
For a long time, I have been interested in understanding why
human societies degrade the natural environment and also in
finding ways to develop a sustainable society. Hence, I pursued
an education in the environmental sciences and sociology. As a
graduate student at Washington State University (1998-2002), I
began working with Eugene Rosa, who served as my dissertation
advisor, mentor, and collaborator. In the early 1990s Rosa had
begun working with Thomas Dietz, now at Michigan State
University, to develop ways to scientifically engage questions
about human-environment interactions. I was invited to join the
research program they established, and this paper, along with
several others, are the product of that collaboration.
Richard York
Assistant Professor
Department of Sociology
University of Oregon
Eugene, OR, USA
|
ESI Special Topics,
April 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/april05-RichardYork.html
|
|