|
Bill McEvily, and Ray Reagans answers a
few questions about this month's fast breaking paper in the field of
Economics & Business.
From
•>>June 2005
Field:
Economics & Business
Article Title: Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range
Authors: Reagans,
R;McEvily, B
Journal: ADMIN SCI QUART
Volume: 48
Page: 240-267
Year: JUN 2003
* Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA.
* Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA.
* Carnegie Mellon Univ, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
We’ve been told that the paper is very "tight"
both in terms of the presentation of theoretical arguments and
the care and precision with which the empirical study is
conducted. The general idea of the paper—that social networks
are crucial to effective knowledge transfer in organizations—has
existed for some time, but there has been very little research
that has directly substantiated this notion in a rigorous
manner.
Does
it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to
others?
It actually refines our understanding of existing theories of
social networks and knowledge transfer. Specifically, the paper
shows that two important properties of social networks that had
previously been considered inconsistent are actually compatible.
And, the paper directly isolates the effects of these two
properties of social networks, whereas previous research had
indirectly inferred their effects.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
The main finding of the paper is that social networks—the
pattern of ties among a set of individuals—ease the flow of
knowledge in organizations. This is interesting because it means
that apart from the quality, or strength, of the relationship
between two people, their connections to other people not
directly involved in their relationship also matter. Two people
are more effective at sharing knowledge when they are connected
to many of the same contacts because such cohesive network
structures promote cooperation. At the same time, when the
person "sending" knowledge has a network characterized
by range—contacts to other people who are themselves
disconnected from each other—that person is more effective at
translating complex ideas to the person "receiving"
knowledge. Taken together, the paper demonstrates that the two
social network properties of cohesion and range are compatible,
rather than in conflict, as previous research had suggested.
How
did you become involved in this research?
Both of us joined Carnegie Mellon as freshly minted Ph.D.s
with principal research interests in social networks. A senior
colleague of ours, Professor Linda Argote, introduced us to her
research on organizational learning and knowledge transfer. As
we learned more about this fascinating area of research we
realized the value of applying a social network perspective to
study how learning and knowledge sharing occurs in
organizations. The basic idea for this paper was "networks
meets knowledge transfer."
Bill McEvily
Associate Professor of Organizational Behavior & Theory
Tepper School of Business
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Ray Reagans
Assistant Professor of Organizational Theory
Columbia Business School
Columbia University
New York, NY, USA
|
ESI Special Topics,
June 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/2005/june05-McEvily_Reagans.html
|
|