By Heidi J. Nast
ESI Special Topics,
August 2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/comments/august02-HeidiNast.html
|
Heidi J. Nast
answers a few questions about this month's fast breaking
paper in field of Social Sciences, general.
From
•>>August 2002
Field: Social Sciences, general
Article Title:
"Mapping the "unconscious": Racism and the oedipal family"
Authors: Nast, HJ
Journal: ANN ASSN AMER GEOGR
Volume: 90
Page: 215-255
Year: JUN 2000
* De Paul Univ, 990 W Fullerton, Chicago, IL 60614 USA.
* De Paul Univ, Chicago, IL 60614 USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited
The paper is an historical and geographical account of the
imaginary body-space that psychologists call "the
psyche." I treat the psyche as a space like any other space—one
whose appearance as an object of study and analysis has a
history and place. At the same time, the paper shows how the
psyche's appearance as an object of analysis coincided with the
many human violences associated with colonialism and its cousin,
racism. In a nutshell, the psyche operated as a place of secrets
where violence was forgotten, stored, and made 'unconscious.'
Perhaps the paper is highly cited because the study lies at the
intersection of many disciplinary interests, including racism,
colonialism, history, geography, and psychoanalysis. That is,
its disciplinary reach is broad.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new discovery or new methodology
that’s useful to others?
I sure hope so! The study shows that by mapping out the
spaces of racism (e.g., the many segregated spaces of most large
northern U.S. cities) and the stories of racial fear that are
called upon to explain and justify this segregation (e.g., fears
of black men as rapists of white women), the original violences
involved in segregation will be uncovered. Uncovering racist
violence is crucial for any national reconciliation and
reparations.
Can
you give us some background on this research?
I was intrigued and puzzled about why so many of the
thousands of black men lynched following reconstruction were
castrated. Castration, according to psychoanalytic theories, is
the punishment meted out by a father on his transgressive
oedipal son (the Oedipus complex). Yet, the most striking public
demonstration of this punishment was meted out by white men on
black men, many lynchings consisting of public celebrations
involving hundreds, if not thousands, of white folks with
children and family members in tow. It seemed that white men
presumed a paternal function, whereas black men were treated as
child-like dependents (called 'boy' or 'son'). I wanted to
understand why.
Can
you summarize the significance of the paper in layperson's terms?
The paper explores how race relations during and after
transatlantic slavery were often sexualized and familialized. In
the U.S. black folk were made to serve as child-like dependents
on their white owners and, later, their white sharecropping
landlords or other employers. After slavery, this sexualization
translated into bodily and spatial containment measures,
especially lynching and segregation. We have sublimated the
violence of these containments, such that today we see most
urban U.S. landscapes as relatively innocuous. We need to
re-examine the origins of the violences that created these
spaces and subordinated bodies—violences that continue through
the present in a number of institutionalized and cultural ways.
Heidi J. Nast
Associate Professor of International Studies and Geography
De Paul University
990 West Fullerton
Chicago, IL 60614
|
ESI Special
Topics, August 2002
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/fbp/comments/august02-HeidiNast.html
|
|
|