|
Why do you think your paper is
highly cited?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
“The paper introduced a new methodology to
deal with what was believed to be (and probably still is) one of
the main difficulties for these types of observations.” |
|
|
|
|
The paper helped convince people that a new generation of
radio telescopes using the 21 cm line of hydrogen could
observe the epoch in the history of our Universe when the
first stars and galaxies formed. Moreover, such observations
make it possible, in principle, to detect the influence of
radiation from these first stars and galaxies on the matter
in the Universe.
Ultimately, it might even be possible to use this
approach to probe cosmic structure at even earlier times in
the history of the Universe, before any luminous sources
existed. The first projects that will try to make these
challenging observations are now under way and,
consequently, a new frontier in observational cosmology is
opening, partly in response to our theoretical work.
Does it describe a new discovery, methodology, or synthesis of
knowledge?
The paper introduced a new methodology to deal with what
was believed to be (and probably still is) one of the main
difficulties for these types of observations. Namely,
emission from sources in the late Universe (foreground
sources) that could be confused with the fainter,
cosmological signal from the distant Universe. In the paper
we introduced a procedure for removing this contamination
and quantified how well it would work.
Would you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s
terms?
It provided a theoretical framework for a new frontier in
observational cosmology that is now ripe for exploration
owing to technological advances, mainly in computer
technology.
How did you become involved in this research and were there any
particular problems encountered along the way?
My main research focus had been in another area of
cosmology, the study of the
Cosmic Microwave
Background (CMB). Lars Hernquist and Steve Furlanetto
approached me to discuss these potential 21 cm observations
to see if some of the techniques developed for the CMB could
be applied in this case. It turned out that the methods
could indeed be generalized and used to address some of the
outstanding problems, such as the effects of foreground
contamination.
Where do you see your research leading in the future?
The challenge now involves making detailed predictions of
what the observatories will see and hopefully inthe near
future use the models we produce to interpret the
observational results. This could lead to interesting new
insights on the properties of this first generation of stars
and galaxies such as their mass and spatial distribution.
There is even the possibility that, in the future, more
ambitious missions could use this technique to learn about
the birth of our Universe—the epoch known as inflation—when
the initial inhomogeneities which resulted in the structure
that we see in our Universe were created. Realizing this
possibility involves significant work on both the
experimental and theoretical sides.
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
The origin and evolution of the Universe has always
intrigued people. In that respect, although cosmology might
not have direct political or social consequences, it still
captures the imagination of the public at large.
Matias Zaldarriaga, Ph.D.
Cosmologist
Professor of Astronomy
Department of Physics
Harvard University
Cambridge, MA, USA |