|
Why do you think your paper is
highly cited?
|
 |
|
|
“The major problem that we encountered along
the way was an absence of federal funding for our research. This
discovery of POLG mutations in Alpers syndrome was funded
entirely by gifts and donations from families, private
foundations, and philanthropic donations.” |
|
|
The cause of Alpers syndrome had remained a mystery for
almost 70 years since its first description by Bernard
Alpers in 1931. A number of leads over the decades failed to
reveal the cause, until our 2004 paper reported the first
two mutations in POLG linked to the disease. Within two
years, the discovery of POLG involvement in Alpers syndrome
was confirmed by several laboratories around the world and
over 40 new causative mutations are now known.
In addition, the field has grown so rapidly that we now
know that mutations in POLG can cause at least seven
different diseases in children and adults, with a combined
disease frequency of nearly 1:10,000. As many as 1:50 people
may be silent carriers of POLG mutations. Indeed, mutations
in the mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma (POLG) may be the
most common single cause of inherited mitochondrial disease
yet discovered. Scientifically, our 2004 paper was a
compelling conclusion to our 1999 paper that showed for the
first time ever, that a human disease (Alpers syndrome) was
linked to a biochemical defect in a DNA polymerase (POLG).
Would you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s
terms?
In practical terms, our discovery led directly to a rapid
DNA test to diagnose Alpers syndrome. Over 80% of the cases
can now be diagnosed by screening for just five common
mutations. Before the advent of a DNA test, Alpers syndrome
could only be confirmed by post-mortem examination. Today,
doctors can diagnose the disease with a simple blood test,
and prenatal diagnosis is also possible.
How did you become involved in this research, and were there
any particular problems encountered along the way?
We became involved in this research as part of our
long-standing interest in the mechanisms of mitochondrial
DNA (mtDNA) evolution, replication, and repair, and because
of an interest I had in understanding why so many of the
drugs we use to treat AIDS were toxic to mitochondria.
Basically, we wanted to answer the question, "How does one
mtDNA become two?" and to study how this process changes in
different cell types, at different stages of development
from embryogenesis to the aging, and to understand what
happens during incidental viral infections.
The major problem that we encountered along the way was
an absence of federal funding for our research. This
discovery of POLG mutations in Alpers syndrome was funded
entirely by gifts and donations from families, private
foundations, and philanthropic donations. We owe a great
debt to all these people who made this discovery possible
with their heartfelt support and active efforts to raise
public awareness for mitochondrial disease.
Where do you see your research leading in the future?
Our immediate goals for the future of this research
involve the development of a mouse model of Alpers syndrome,
with the aim of better understanding the disease and
developing new treatments, not only for Alpers syndrome in
particular, but also for several other mitochondrial
disorders that share common threads of pathogenesis.
It is our hope that when these studies are merged with
others in our lab, such as the use of rapid optical methods
for diagnosing mitochondrial dysfunction and the role of
mitochondria in wound healing and regeneration, that we will
be able to develop methods for earlier diagnosis, and
perhaps even reduce the risk of developing more complex
disorders like diabetes, Alzheimer dementia, autoimmune
disorders, heart disease, and cancer.
Are there any social or political implications for your
research?
I believe there are two important messages that come from
this work. First, there is the message that grassroots
support of science in America can make a difference for
people that is felt around the world when government support
of basic research in the life sciences falters.
Second, there is the message that the blossoming of
mitochondrial medicine over the past decade has announced
the emergence of a fully mature new discipline in biology
and medicine. Mitochondrial medicine may be the new kid on
the block, but it is now clear that the health and illness
of the mitochondria in our cells, critically determine our
own health and our susceptibility to disease. This
fundamental understanding now unites all medical
specialties.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) currently have no
unified infrastructure for ensuring continued support for
mitochondrial disease research in America. The time is
ripe—both the grassroots support and the scientific clout
are present—for the initiation of United States
Congressional discussions to create a new "National
Institute of Mitochondrial Medicine" to ensure progress and
answer the swelling need for new research in this important
area of medicine.
Robert K. Naviaux, M.D., Ph.D.
Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics
President, Mitochondrial Medicine Society,
¦Website¦
Associate Professor and Co-director
The Mitochondrial and Metabolic Disease Center,
¦Website¦
Biochemical Genetics and Metabolism
UCSD School of Medicine
University of California, San Diego
San Diego, CA, USA
|
|
A Closer Look...
|
 |
Below
are images sent in by Robert K. Naviaux which correspond with the featured
paper, or current research. |
|
|
Figure 1:
 |
| |
|
| |
|
Figure 2:
 |
| |
|
| |
|
Figure 3:
 |
| |
|
| |
|