n this
interview, Dr. Christopher Romanek discusses his highly cited
Mars research. According to our Special Topics analysis of
this field, Dr. Romanek’s work ranks at #7, with 16 papers
cited a total of 815 times. Four of his papers also appear on
our top 20 lists in this topic. In the ISI
Essential
Science Indicators
Web product, Dr. Romanek’s record includes 19 papers cited a
total of 870 times to date in the field of Geosciences. Dr.
Romanek is an Associate Professor in the Department of Geology
at the University of Georgia, as well as an Associate Research
Ecologist at the university’s Savannah River Ecology
Laboratory.
|
What
are the circumstances which led you to your work? Why would you say
your work is highly cited? How would you describe the significance of
this work for your field?
The papers I have published in this area rely exclusively on
observations made from samples of meteorites thought to have come
from the surface of Mars, and among those a particular meteorite
named ALH84001 stands out. In 1993, David Mittlefehldt was analyzing
the HED class of meteorites, and discovered that one sample, named
ALH84001, was probably a Martian meteorite. I had the opportunity to
study unusual carbonate minerals in this rock not long after this
discovery, and it was from those early efforts that my highly cited
references originated.
|

“As biologists use new tools to uncover the intricacies of the living world, earth scientists will be adapting them to clarify the significance of biological remnants in the rock record.” |
|
At first, interest in this work was limited to the meteoritical
community, as my first paper in Nature in 1994 focused on
predictions related to the source of carbon and temperature(s) of
formation for the carbonates. But continued research led to a second
publication in Science in 1996 that raised awareness in the
scientific community of the breadth of information that can be
gleaned from martian meteorites. Based on previous studies of
terrestrial carbonates, I hypothesized that evidence of microbial
activity may be uncovered in the carbonates from the ALH84001
meteorite. A small group of researchers, including myself, began
studying the carbonates in great detail and asking fundamental
questions regarding what substantive fossil evidence proves the
existence of biological activity in rocks. While a biological origin
for carbonates in the ALH84001 meteorite remains a highly
controversial topic, the paper in Science galvanized efforts
in the earth sciences community to critically evaluate and develop
objective criteria to determine biological origins for surficial
materials. Knowledge about the origin of life is ultimately held in
Earth's oldest sedimentary rocks, or potentially other surficial
deposits of our solar system. The charge to the scientific community
is to unambiguously determine the origin of these materials when we
are fortunate enough to have access to them.
How
much has this research advanced since you first started publishing on
it?
A significant body of information has been generated over the
last 10 years that deals with the influence of biological activity
on rocks and minerals. Notable among these are studies that use
novel tools such as non-traditional stable isotopes to characterize
biological fingerprints of life in surficial materials. One
promising example is stable Fe-isotope analysis, which has emerged
as a technique to better understand redox reactions that may be
exploited by microorganisms to extract energy from the environment
for metabolism and growth. Oftentimes, these reactions leave behind
geochemical and isotopic traces in the rock record.
Where
do you see this research going 10 years from now?
The explosion of molecular techniques in the biological sciences
will undoubtedly impact the earth sciences greatly as these two
fields merge in the future. The influence of biology in shaping the
physicochemical world has been known for a long time but the extent
of the interaction(s) is only beginning to be realized. As
biologists use new tools to uncover the intricacies of the living
world, earth scientists will be adapting them to clarify the
significance of biological remnants in the rock record.
What
lessons would you draw from your work to share with the next
generation of researchers?
A lesson of great value that most scientists already follow, but
should not forget, is to question data supporting both sides of an
issue with equal rigor. The true answer to a question rarely lies as
an end-member solution but at the intersection of diverse ideas.
Christopher Romanek, Ph.D.
Department of Geology
University of Georgia
Athens, GA, USA
and
Savannah River Ecology Laboratory
University of Georgia
Aiken, SC, USA
|
ESI Special Topics, August
2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/mars/interviews/ChristopherRomanek.html
|
|