What unexpected or serendipitous events arose in the course of your
research?
Our research on MgB2 consisted of a series of surprises, almost all
of them very pleasant. When we heard of the announcement of
superconductivity in this compound by J. Akamitsu (Jan. 10, 2001) we
were shocked and immediately had a series of questions. Could we make
this material? Could we confirm this claim? If so, could we shed light
onto the mechanism of the superconductivity? And could we delineate
the basic properties of this compound?
Within a few days we were able to answer the first several
questions. We very rapidly developed a simple method of synthesizing
high-purity MgB2, confirmed the transition temperature of Tc ~ 40 K,
and established that this material was probably an extreme example of
old-fashioned superconductivity (similar to other superconductors made
up of metallic elements and different from the copper-oxide high-Tc
compounds). We then developed a form-preserving synthesis route for
turning boron of a specific form into MgB2 with a similar form: e.g.,
we found that if we take a boron fiber (commercially available)
and
expose it to Mg vapor we could turn it into a MgB2 wire segment. In a
similar manner we could take a thin film of boron and turn it into a
thin film of MgB2. This discovery allowed us to continue our research
into the basic properties of this compound and also made it very clear
(within a month of the discovery of superconductivity) that MgB2 may
have significant potential as an applied material.
I suspect that the greatest surprises about MgB2 was the speed at
which our (humanity’s) understanding of the superconducting state
grew: day by day (with Web postings of papers) rather than week by
week or month by month. The second surprise about MgB2 was that it has
been a known compound for over 50 years with its superconductivity
almost being discovered in the late 1950’s. In some sense MgB2 is a
poster child for how far the field of solid state physics has come
and, at the same time, for how much more we have to learn about the
materials around us.
What role did practical support (facilities, funding, etc.) play?
A vital role! Our research group is part of both the Department of
Physics and Astronomy at Iowa State University (ISU) as well as the
Condensed Matter Physics program of Ames Laboratory (a Department of
Energy Laboratory located on the campus of ISU). The D.O.E. and Ames
Laboratory have a long history of supporting new materials research.
Ames Laboratory has an over 50-year tradition of strong interactions
between physicists, chemists, and metallurgists, and has excellent
facilities for the design, synthesis, characterization, and
theoretical modeling of novel compounds.
There is also a great deal of flexibility when it comes to chasing
new ideas or materials. Within two days of hearing the rumor of
superconductivity in MgB2 we were dedicating most of our efforts
toward understanding this simple compound. Within about four days we
had measured the isotope effect in MgB2, thereby establishing the
mechanism of superconductivity, and within four weeks we had three
different papers about MgB2 accepted for publication in Physical
Review Letters, as well as several other papers posted on the web.
Our ability to respond so promptly is primarily due to the support and
encouragement of D.O.E., Office of Basic Energy Sciences.
How do you see the current state of affairs in your field and its
prospects for the future?
The field of new materials research is wide open. It involves
scientists from a broad range of traditional disciplines (traditional
departments in universities): physicists, chemists, metallurgists, and
materials scientists to name a few. Over the past decades much (but
not all) of the exciting discoveries in solid state physics have been
associated with the discovery of new materials (or materials
properties). We (humanity) have only a moderate knowledge of the
properties of simply binary compounds (as illustrated by MgB2 itself)
and a very limited knowledge of ternary, quaternary, and more complex
compounds. These materials will be the ones that will provide us the
improved structural, electronic, magnetic, etc. compounds of the
future. The challenge is two-fold: to design/discover, characterize,
and understand the basic physics of novel materials and novel
groundstates; and to use this understanding to try to design/discover
compounds that will be useful for real applications.
What are the implications of your work for the future of your field
in terms of applications/products?
In the case of MgB2 there is the very real likelihood that wires of
this material will be used to make superconducting electromagnets that
will produce the magnetic fields for machines such as the MRI
(magnetic resonance imaging) devices found in many hospitals. In
addition there is also the hope that MgB2 will prove to be useful for
electronic applications as well. There are several advantages that
MgB2 has over traditional superconductors. First of all, a transition
temperature of 40 K means that it will be useful when cooled to
temperatures near 20 K. Whereas this is still a very low temperature
(about –250 C) it is fairly easily reached by closed cycle
refrigeration. This means that superconducting devices made from MgB2
could be cooled without the need for liquid cryogens. In addition MgB2
has a very low mass density (it’s lightweight) and it has a very low
electrical resistivity in the non-superconducting state.
MgB2 does have a lower transition temperature than some of the
oxide-based, high-Tc, superconductors, but since MgB2 appears to be a
simple, old-fashioned superconductor (with a rather high Tc) it is
much easier to work with and appears easier to manipulate.
One important thing to keep in mind is that superconductivity in
MgB2 has only been known for about 18 months. There is a lot of
applied research yet to be done that will determine whether this will
truly be a "useful" material. Right now things do look
promising, but time will tell.
What would you rate as your most difficult or trying professional
moment?
Having to judge other people’s work as part of review boards or
committees. This task requires care and honesty and is difficult
because it involves people’s careers, funding, and/or egos.
Which of your professional achievements brings you the most
satisfaction?
- Answering questions, often via design, execution and analysis of
experimental measurements.
- Seeing my students and/or post-docs learn, grow, and do well.
Aside from your scientific career, what is your greatest or most
compelling ambition in life?
To spend time with my family and enjoy their company.
Dr. Paul C. Canfield
Iowa State University, Department of Physics
Ames Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy
Ames, IA, USA