|
Daphna Oyserman answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Psychiatry/Psychology.
From
•>>July 2003
Field:
Psychiatry/Psychology
Article Title: "Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses"
Authors: Oyserman,
D;Coon, HM;Kemmelmeier, M
Journal: PSYCHOL BULL
Volume: 128
Page: 3-72
Year: JAN 2002
* Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Room 5240, 426 Thompson Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA.
* Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA.
* Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
The topic—the meaning of culture and implications of cultural
differences between countries and within the U.S.—is one that
concerns many social scientists.
Does
it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to
others?
Our methods, meta-analyses and theory-based review, are not
different, however, our "discovery," what emerges from our
review, about the nature of cultural difference is quite useful.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
We find that European Americans are more individualistic—valuing
personal independence more, and are therefore less collectivistic—feeling
less duty to in-groups, than is the average in other countries.
However, within the U.S., high individualism is the norm across the
three groups described in the literature—African Americans, Latino
Americans, and European Americans; indeed, African Americans are
more individualistic than European Americans, and Latino Americans
do not essentially differ from European Americans on the subject of
individualism. Moreover, cross-culturally, Koreans and Japanese are
not lower in individualism than Americans are. These findings are
important firstly because the content of self-concept and ways of
relating to and interacting with others are moderately influenced by
individualism and collectivism, and secondly because these cultural
differences show large effects on attribution and cognitive style.
How
did you become involved in this research?
I have been studying culture and implications of cultural
differences since noticing what appeared to be cultural differences
in the meaning of what constitutes the self and what it means to be
a self in my first semester of teaching as a beginning faculty
member.
Daphna Oyserman, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Psychology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Read
comments by Markus Kemmelmeier; co-author of this New Hot Paper.
|
ESI Special Topics, July 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2003/july-03-DaphnaOyserman.html
|
|