Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

New Hot Paper Comments

By Daphna Oyserman

ESI Special Topics, July 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2003/july-03-DaphnaOyserman.html

Daphna Oyserman answers a few questions about this month's new hot paper in the field of Psychiatry/Psychology.


From •>>July 2003

Field: Psychiatry/Psychology
Article Title: "Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses"
Authors: Oyserman, D;Coon, HM;Kemmelmeier, M
Journal: PSYCHOL BULL
Volume: 128
Page: 3-72
Year: JAN 2002
* Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Room 5240, 426 Thompson Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA.
* Univ Michigan, Inst Social Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA.
* Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48106 USA.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?

The topic—the meaning of culture and implications of cultural differences between countries and within the U.S.—is one that concerns many social scientists.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to others?

Our methods, meta-analyses and theory-based review, are not different, however, our "discovery," what emerges from our review, about the nature of cultural difference is quite useful.

ST:  Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?

We find that European Americans are more individualistic—valuing personal independence more, and are therefore less collectivistic—feeling less duty to in-groups, than is the average in other countries. However, within the U.S., high individualism is the norm across the three groups described in the literature—African Americans, Latino Americans, and European Americans; indeed, African Americans are more individualistic than European Americans, and Latino Americans do not essentially differ from European Americans on the subject of individualism. Moreover, cross-culturally, Koreans and Japanese are not lower in individualism than Americans are. These findings are important firstly because the content of self-concept and ways of relating to and interacting with others are moderately influenced by individualism and collectivism, and secondly because these cultural differences show large effects on attribution and cognitive style.

ST:  How did you become involved in this research?

I have been studying culture and implications of cultural differences since noticing what appeared to be cultural differences in the meaning of what constitutes the self and what it means to be a self in my first semester of teaching as a beginning faculty member.End

Daphna Oyserman, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Psychology
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Read comments by Markus Kemmelmeier; co-author of this New Hot Paper.

ESI Special Topics, July 2003
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2003/july-03-DaphnaOyserman.html

•> Search Special Topics
New Hot Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
New Hot Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.