|
Ronald R. Breaker answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Biology & Biochemistry.
From
•>>March 2004
Field:
Biology & Biochemistry
Article Title: Thiamine derivatives bind messenger RNAs directly to regulate bacterial gene expression
Authors: Winkler, W;Nahvi, A;Breaker, RR
Journal: NATURE
Volume: 419
Page: 952-956
Year: OCT 31 2002
* Yale Univ, Dept Mol Cellular & Dev Biol, POB 208103, New Haven, CT 06520 USA.
* Yale Univ, Dept Mol Cellular & Dev Biol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA.
* Yale Univ, Dept Mol Biophys & Biochem, New Haven, CT 06520 USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
|

“With
riboswitches, metabolite sensing is part of the messenger RNA, and proteins are not required to control genes.”
|
|
Our paper provided the first biochemical proof that messenger
RNAs can form structures called "riboswitches" that
directly bind metabolites, without the aid of proteins, and
subsequently control gene expression. Riboswitches are a simpler
form of genetic control and serve as objects of research for those
who study how modern gene control systems work, for those who
engineer RNA to exhibit novel functions, and for those who are
testing theories about how complex life forms emerged from primitive
biochemicals.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new methodology that’s useful to
others?
There was some published (and much unpublished) speculation that
RNA molecules could serve as metabolite-binding gene control
elements spanning the last decade. In addition, there were data
being published as much as 30 years ago that we can now recognize as
implicating the existence of riboswitches. What our work has done is
provide the convincing evidence that riboswitches exist, that they
form binding pockets for specific and high-affinity binding of their
target compounds, and that they use defined allosteric mechanisms
for converting a ligand-binding event into a gene control output.
What
were some of the circumstances that led you to do this research?
We had been using a process called "test tube
evolution" to create RNA switches in the laboratory. From
trillions of molecular misfits, we isolate rare molecules that
function as metabolite-dependent switches in a process that
simulates Darwinian evolution. While generating a series of such RNA
switches to create an "RNA array" biosensor, we recognized
that RNA switches were relatively easy to make, and most likely
nature would have made use of this same technology in modern cells,
and perhaps in ancient cells from billions of years ago. We
speculated that, if riboswitches were in modern organisms, hints of
such systems would be in the literature. To date, seven distinct
classes of riboswitches have been confirmed by examining gene
control mysteries that had been reported by others.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
Previously, it was believed that proteins were needed to sense
important chemical compounds. Therefore proteins would be required
to bind metabolites and subsequently modulate the expression of
genes. With riboswitches, metabolite sensing is part of the
messenger RNA, and proteins are not required to control genes. For
cell biologists, this provides a newfound way in which genes can be
turned on or off. For those who seek to understand how life evolved
from primitive to complex cells, this finding explains how simple
organisms could control cellular process even before proteins
emerged in evolution.
Dr. Ronald R. Breaker
Associate Professor
Yale University
Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology
New Haven, CT, USA
|
ESI Special Topics,
March 2004
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2004/march-04-RonaldRBreaker.html
|
|