|
Sean Carroll, Mark Hoffman, and Mark Trodden answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Physics.
From
•>>January 2005
Field:
Physics
Article Title: Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than-1? - art. no. 023509
Authors: Carroll,
SM;Hoffman, M;Trodden, M
Journal: PHYS REV D
Volume: 6802
Page: 3509-3509
Year: JUL 15 2003
* Univ Chicago, Enrico Fermi Inst, Dept Phys, 5640 S Ellis Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
* Univ Chicago, Enrico Fermi Inst, Dept Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
* Univ Chicago, Ctr Cosmol Phys, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
* Syracuse Univ, Dept Phys, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
We investigated a fundamental
problem with models of "phantom" dark energy. Phantom
energy has the unique property that the energy density actually
grows as the universe expands. While such behavior is allowed by
current cosmological data, there was a general feeling that there
must be something problematic about such models from the particle
physics viewpoint. Our paper demonstrated explicitly that such
models were unstable to decay into gravitons and showed that the
requirement that this instability be on a time-scale longer than the
age of the universe puts extremely tight constraints on such models.
We also had a good title.
Does
it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to
others?
It demonstrates a deep problem with a broad class of dark
energy models. This provides a theoretical constraint on the
evolution of dark energy with time; these serve as useful
complements to existing observational limits.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?
The discovery of the acceleration of the universe seems to
imply that there is something important that we do not understand
about particle physics and/or gravity. The acceleration could be
due to a new source of energy in the universe (dubbed "dark
energy") or due to new gravitational physics. If it is due to
dark energy, the important issue becomes how that energy evolves
as the universe expands. We know that the density of dark energy
must evolve gradually, if at all; but we don't know whether the
density is slowly decreasing, slowly increasing, or precisely
constant. The possibility that the density (the amount of energy
in each cubic centimeter of space) might be increasing is
intriguing, but violates some cherished beliefs about the behavior
of energy in an expanding universe. Our paper examines the
possibility that such models could be ultimately unstable, by
calculating the rate at which empty space spontaneously decays
into gravitons. If it decays in a time shorter than the age of the
universe, then it won't work as a dark energy model. We find that
this provides an extremely strong constraint on these models.
How
did you become involved in this research?
Dark energy is an extremely important area of research today.
We've been working on different aspects of it for a number of
years now. We had been discussing general particle physics
properties of models, and many people expressed an opinion that
phantom models would be unstable, but there always seemed to be
loopholes in the general arguments. We
eventually decided it would be a useful contribution to try to explore
the instability explicitly in a given model.
Sean M. Carroll
Assistant Professor
Department of Physics
Enrico Fermi Institute and Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Mark Hoffman
Associate
McKinsey and Company
Florham Park, NJ, USA
Mark Trodden
Associate Professor
Department of Physics
Syracuse University
Syracuse, NY, USA
|
ESI Special Topics,
January 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2005/january-05-Carroll-Hoffman-Trodden.html
|
|