|
Marc Pfeffer answers a few questions about this month's
new hot paper in the field of Clinical Medicine.
From
•>>January 2005
Field:
Clinical Medicine
Article Title: Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme
Authors: Pfeffer,
MA;Swedberg, K;Granger, CB;Held, P;McMurray,
JJV;Michelson, EL;Olofsson, B;Ostergren, J;Yusuf, S
Journal: LANCET
Volume: 362
Page: 759-766
Year: SEP 6 2003
* Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
* Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc, Boston, MA 02115 USA.
* Sahlgrenska Univ Hosp Ostra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
* Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA.
* AstraZeneca R&D, Molndal, Sweden.
* Univ Glasgow, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland.
* AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE USA.
* Karolinska Hosp, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden.
* Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
* McMaster Univ, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
|
Why
do you think your paper is highly cited?
|

“CHARM was designed to ascertain whether the angiotensin receptor blocker candesartan could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death or need for hospitalization for management of heart failure of the broadest range of patients identified as having symptomatic heart failure in spite of optimal medical management.”
|
|
This article represents the overall summary of an international
program of research, which was simultaneously presented at the Hot
Topics session of the European Congress of Cardiology and
concurrently published in four manuscripts in the Lancet. "Candesartan
in Heart failure Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity
(CHARM)" was one of the largest and most inclusive randomized
controlled trials evaluating a pharmacologic approach for patients
with heart failure. Despite the major pharmacologic advances (angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers) in
the management of patients with symptomatic heart failure, the
incidence and health-care burden of heart failure continues to
expand with the increasing proportion of elderly in developed
nations.
Does
it describe a new discovery or new methodology that’s useful to
others?
CHARM was designed to ascertain whether the angiotensin receptor
blocker candesartan could reduce the incidence of cardiovascular
death or need for hospitalization for management of heart failure of
the broadest range of patients identified as having symptomatic
heart failure in spite of optimal medical management. Across the
Program, patients were enrolled into one of three components trials
based on either having reduced left ventricular ejection fraction
(less than or equal to 40%) not being treated with an ACE inhibitor
due to prior intolerance (CHARM Alternative), on an ACE inhibitor
(CHARM Added), or perhaps the most unique group for clinical trials,
those with a left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 40%
regardless of ACE inhibitor use (CHARM Preserved). Each of these
trials had its own hypotheses, sample size and objectives. The
collective experience (CHARM Program) was prespecified to be
analyzed for mortality, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes
of death, as well as provide the best tool for assessing subgroups
and safety.
Could
you summarize the significance of your paper in layman’s terms?
In patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction,
randomization to candesartan reduced the risk of cardiovascular
death or hospitalization for heart failure in both CHARM Alternative
(risk reduction 23%) and CHARM Added (risk reduction 15%). All-cause
mortality in the combined group of patients with low ejection
fraction was also demonstrated. These benefits were independent and
indeed additive to the use of both ACE inhibitor and beta-blockers,
representing a new advance in the management of patients with
symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Although
significant benefits in this primary outcome were not achieved in
CHARM Preserved, fewer patients on candesartan were hospitalized for
heart failure. Overall, the risk of cardiovascular death, the
composite outcome of CV death, and hospitalization for heart failure
and new onset diabetes were reduced in the CHARM Program.
Candesartan therapy was associated with higher rates of renal
impairment and hyperkalemia, meaning additional laboratory
monitoring will be required when candesartan is used to produce the
clinical benefits.
How
did you become involved in this research?
The CHARM Program represented a novel approach to the treatment
of a broad spectrum of patients with heart failure. The trial
academic leadership of the Program was somewhat unique in that it
was led by an effective quintet consisting of the Program co-leaders
Drs. Karl Swedberg and Marc
Pfeffer, in partnership with the individual lead
investigators of each component trial, Drs. Chris Granger, John
McMurray, and Salim
Yusuf
[see
also] (CHARM Alternative,
Added, and Preserved, respectively). This leadership group has
established an outstanding working relationship and continues to
collaborate to assist others in extracting the most meaningful
information available from what is to date the largest and most
inclusive clinical trial experience of patients with symptomatic heart
failure. Several additional articles have also been published.
Marc A. Pfeffer, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School
Interim Chair of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Karl Swedberg, M.D., Ph.D.
Professor of Medicine
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Ostra, Goteborg University
Goteborg, Sweden

|
ESI Special Topics,
January 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2005/january-05-MarcPfeffer.html
|
|