Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.

New Hot Paper Comments

By Gregg R. Henriques

ESI Special Topics, July 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2005/july-05-GreggRHenriques.html

Gregg R. Henriques answers a few questions about this month's new hot paper in the field of Psychiatry/Psychology.


From •>>July 2005

Field: Psychiatry/Psychology
Article Title: Psychology defined
Authors: Henriques, GR
Journal: J CLIN PSYCHOL
Volume: 60
Page: 1207-1221
Year: DEC 2004
* James Madison Univ, Dept Grad Psychol, MSC 7401, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA.
* James Madison Univ, Dept Grad Psychol, Harrisonburg, VA 22807 USA.

ST:  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?


“From the Big Bang to the whole shebang: quantum gravity, the modern evolutionary synthesis, B.F Skinner and Sigmund Freud, the ToK connects huge pieces of the puzzle of knowledge and offers new, unified picture that could revolutionize, well, almost everything.”

Since its inception as an independent discipline, the field of psychology has had serious difficulty developing a unified theoretical formulation and a clear definition of its subject matter. And it has also struggled to define its relationship to other sciences. For example, many individuals see psychology as a natural science, others see it as a social science, and still others question whether it is a science at all. Related to the confusion surrounding its definition is the fact that, perhaps more than any other discipline, psychology exists at the intersection of the three great branches of learning: the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities. So when a paper such as the one I offered purports to define psychology, it attracts a lot of interest.

ST:  Does it describe a new discovery or a new methodology that's useful to others?

The clear definition and theoretical unification of psychology is achieved through the introduction of a new scientific humanistic philosophy called the Tree of Knowledge (ToK) System. The ToK System is a theory of the evolution of complexity as presently mapped out by science. It takes the spectrum of what we know (and what we think we know) and systematizes it into four distinct hierarchically arranged levels of complexity: Matter, Life, Mind, and Culture. This novel depiction of cosmic evolution is used to show how psychology corresponds to the dimension of Mind and how it connects to biology (which corresponds to the dimension of Life) from below, and to the social sciences (which corresponds to the dimension of Culture) from above.

ST:  Could you summarize the significance of your paper in layman's terms?

Stephen Hawking wrote that if we discovered the "ultimate theory of the universe…it would bring an end to a long and glorious chapter in the history of humanity’s intellectual struggle to understand the universe" and would "revolutionize the ordinary person’s understanding" of how the world works. I believe the ToK System represents a crucial step in this direction. It is essentially a theory of theories that streamlines human knowledge into an integrated, coherent system. From the Big Bang to the whole shebang—quantum gravity, the modern evolutionary synthesis, B.F Skinner, and Sigmund Freud—the ToK connects huge pieces of the puzzle of knowledge and offers a new, unified picture that could revolutionize, well, almost everything.

ST:  How did you become involved in this research?

Just over 10 years ago I became increasingly appalled and discouraged by the state of psychology. Trained as a clinician, I wanted to be sure that the psychotherapy I provided was grounded in a coherent empirically supported theoretical understanding of human behavior. Yet as I progressed through my doctoral training, it became clear to me that, at a theoretical level, psychology was a mess. The dominant perspectives such as cognitive science, behavioral science, psychodynamic theory, social constructionist views, evolutionary psychology, neuroscience, humanistic approaches, and so on, clearly had crucial things to say. Yet when one surveyed the discipline as a whole, the only general conclusion was that psychology was a buzzing mass of confusion. So, for my own edification, I surveyed a broad array of literatures. Ultimately, a model emerged that is broader and more successful at organizing knowledge than I would have ever dreamed possible.End

Gregg Henriques, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Combined-Integrated Doctoral Program
Department of Graduate Psychology
James Madison University
Harrisonburg, VA, USA

ESI Special Topics, July 2005
Citing URL - http://www.esi-topics.com/nhp/2005/july-05-GreggRHenriques.html

•> Search Special Topics
New Hot Papers Menu || All Topics Menu
New Hot Papers Comments Menu
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.