Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
Thomson
Essential Science Indicators - Special Topics  RSS feeds for the editorial Web sites of Essential Science Indicators.
All Topics Menu
|  Previous Page  |  |  Special Topics Menu  |  |  Next Page  |      Help || About || Contact

•> Search Special Topics
Tropical Storms Menu

ESI Special Topic: Tropical Storms
Publication Date: July 2006

Tropical Storms

ESI Special Topics: September 2006
Citing URL: http://esi-topics.com/tropical/interviews/MarkPowell.html

An INTERVIEW with Dr. Mark Powell
According to our Special Topics analysis of tropical storm research, the scientist ranking at #10 is Dr. Mark Powell, with 13 qualifying papers cited a total of 174 times to date. Dr. Powell is an atmospheric scientist in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Hurricane Research Division, which is located at the Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory in Miami, Florida. In the interview below, Dr. Powell talks about his highly cited hurricane research.

ST:  What first inspired you to get into storm research?

I grew up racing sailboats on the Great South Bay of Long Island in New York and became intrigued by the weather, especially the winds and waves. We experienced a few hurricanes and I was always glued to the windows (not a good idea!) to see how far the trees could bend in the gusts. I raced in college at Florida State and developed a keen interest in the behavior of winds...to try to get a competitive advantage out on the race course. I still compete in sailing today and am a member of the 2006 U. S. Sailing Team in the RS:X Windsurfing class. Hurricane winds are fascinating on a variety of time and space scales; there are few things so beautiful (or maybe I should say sickening) as the sea surface as observed out the window of a NOAA P3 flying 250 m above the waves in 100 kt winds!

ST:  Several of your papers deal with hurricane projection. How has projection improved over the years, and what still needs to be addressed?


“...I don’t really pay much attention to whether it’s expected to be an active year or not—I want to know whether Andrew is coming.”

A few years ago we were asked by the state of Florida to assist in developing a public insurance loss projection model. We have a team of scientists from several universities representing Atmospheric Science, Wind Engineering, Statistics, Computer Science, and Finance. The models available today for rate-making are proprietary, so it’s important that the state have the ability to look at results and evaluate risk with a baseline model that is transparent, independent, and open to public scrutiny.

Starting with the characteristics of the hurricane climate record, we simulate thousands of years of hurricane activity, look at the probabilities of a given location having winds above various levels, and compute the damage and the resulting insurance losses. These models have been around since the mid-1980s and as computing power has improved they’ve become very sophisticated, with the ability to simulate the complete lifecycle of storms from genesis through several days of movement, to landfall, and then decay. The challenge is to continually evaluate and improve the model by bringing in new findings as the research progresses in several fields. At the same time we are required to undergo a vigorous model-certification process each year which expends an incredible amount of time and resources; it should probably be every two years or so.

ST:  Your 2001 Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society paper, "Accuracy of United States tropical cyclone landfall forecasts in the Atlantic basin (1976-2000)," recommended that the National Weather Service Strategic Plan and the US Weather Research Program (USWRP) track forecast goals be reconsidered based on the results of the study. What were the main findings of this paper? Were these plans revised to line up with your recommendations?

Landfall forecasts are a difficult concept. Specific hurricane landfall forecasts are not issued because forecasters and emergency managers do not want the public to focus on a particular location when the uncertainty of the forecast is such that in the next six hours the forecast will shift to a new location, and then another one or perhaps back again in another six hours. However, it’s still pretty easy for the public to draw the "thin line" and see where the forecast crosses the coast, effectively making it a landfall forecast. In my opinion, these are the most important forecasts and need to be evaluated after each event.

Our paper evaluated the errors and found no significant improvement in forecasts of landfall position over a 25-year period, compared with improvements of ~1% per year for general position forecasts in the Atlantic basin. Landfall forecasts comprise only about 13% of all forecasts issued so our sample size was relatively small but we are continuing this work and hope to have updated accuracy estimates for the period of 1976-2006 by next year. The new NOAA strategic plans no longer specifically discuss improving hurricane landfall forecasts, but the USWRP landfall forecast goals are still listed in announcement of federal funding opportunity for the Joint Hurricane Testbed.

ST:  How bad do you think this year's hurricane season will be? Are we prepared?

The seasonal forecasts of hurricane activity seem to capture the media’s attention and everybody and their brother are doing press conferences about their forecast or forecast update. In 1992 Hurricane Andrew struck during a year with a seasonal forecast of "lower than normal" activity. Speaking as a Floridian affected by Andrew and other storms, I don’t really pay much attention to whether it’s expected to be an active year or not—I want to know whether Andrew is coming. The people of Florida have experienced eight hurricanes over the last two years, North and South Carolina had a bunch of storms from 1996-2003, and Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas dealt with Ivan, Katrina, and Rita recently, so the people in those states are probably well prepared. The places to worry about are where there have not been storms in folks’ recent memory—probably Georgia, the southern Texas coast, and the Atlantic coast from Maryland to Maine.

ST:  If you are free to do so, would you tell us about your current projects?

We are continuing to work on analysis of mean wind profiles in hurricanes to look how the surface drag coefficient changes due to wind-wave interactions. I’m also hoping to work on the effects of shallow water wave breaking on the mean vertical profile. We are continuing to conduct near-real-time analyses of the surface wind fields of hurricanes. These provide a record of events and are being used by researchers in other fields to provide wind forcing to wave, storm surge, insurance loss, and even ecological models. They can be found on our 1Web site.

Another exciting area we’ve been working on for a couple of years now is to use our wind field analyses to provide new metrics for hurricane intensity that are less sensitive to the estimate of the maximum wind speed in the storm. Methods based on looking at the contribution of kinetic energy by winds over various threshold values associated with wind, wave, and storm surge damage show great promise as indicators of the potential impact from a hurricane, and will provide a more robust means of comparing intensity forecasts to the observations.End

Mark. D. Powell, PhD
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory
Hurricane Research Division
Miami, FL, USA

The opinions in this interview are those of Mark Powell and not to be construed as official NOAA viewpoints.


Related Links:

1

 http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/data_sub/wind.html
All external sites will open in a new browser. The Thomson Corporation and esi-topics.com does not endorse external sites.

ESI Special Topics: September 2006
Citing URL: http://esi-topics.com/tropical/interviews/MarkPowell.html

•> Search Special Topics
Tropical Storms Menu
|| All Topics Menu ||
Interview Index
Help || About || Contact

ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Write to the Webmaster with questions/comments. Terms of Usage.
The Research Services Group of Thomson Scientific |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.