ccording
to our Special Topics analysis of tropical storm research, the
scientist ranking at #10 is Dr. Mark Powell, with 13
qualifying papers cited a total of 174 times to date. Dr.
Powell is an atmospheric scientist in the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Hurricane Research
Division, which is located at the Atlantic Oceanographic and
Meteorological Laboratory in Miami, Florida. In the interview
below, Dr. Powell talks about his highly cited hurricane
research.
|
What
first inspired you to get into storm research?
I grew up racing sailboats on the Great South Bay of Long Island
in New York and became intrigued by the weather, especially the
winds and waves. We experienced a few hurricanes and I was always
glued to the windows (not a good idea!) to see how far the trees
could bend in the gusts. I raced in college at Florida State and
developed a keen interest in the behavior of winds...to try to get a
competitive advantage out on the race course. I still compete in
sailing today and am a member of the 2006 U. S. Sailing Team in the
RS:X Windsurfing class. Hurricane winds are fascinating on a variety
of time and space scales; there are few things so beautiful (or
maybe I should say sickening) as the sea surface as observed out the
window of a NOAA P3 flying 250 m above the waves in 100 kt winds!
Several
of your papers deal with hurricane projection. How has projection
improved over the years, and what still needs to be addressed?
|

“...I don’t really pay much attention to whether it’s expected to be an active year or not—I want to know whether Andrew is coming.”
|
|
A few years ago we were asked by the state of Florida to assist
in developing a public insurance loss projection model. We have a
team of scientists from several universities representing
Atmospheric Science, Wind Engineering, Statistics, Computer Science,
and Finance. The models available today for rate-making are
proprietary, so it’s important that the state have the ability to
look at results and evaluate risk with a baseline model that is
transparent, independent, and open to public scrutiny.
Starting with the characteristics of the hurricane climate
record, we simulate thousands of years of hurricane activity, look
at the probabilities of a given location having winds above various
levels, and compute the damage and the resulting insurance losses.
These models have been around since the mid-1980s and as computing
power has improved they’ve become very sophisticated, with the
ability to simulate the complete lifecycle of storms from genesis
through several days of movement, to landfall, and then decay. The
challenge is to continually evaluate and improve the model by
bringing in new findings as the research progresses in several
fields. At the same time we are required to undergo a vigorous
model-certification process each year which expends an incredible
amount of time and resources; it should probably be every two years
or so.
Your
2001 Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society paper,
"Accuracy of United States tropical cyclone landfall forecasts in
the Atlantic basin (1976-2000)," recommended that the National
Weather Service Strategic Plan and the US Weather Research Program (USWRP)
track forecast goals be reconsidered based on the results of the
study. What were the main findings of this paper? Were these plans
revised to line up with your recommendations?
Landfall forecasts are a difficult concept. Specific hurricane
landfall forecasts are not issued because forecasters and emergency
managers do not want the public to focus on a particular location
when the uncertainty of the forecast is such that in the next six
hours the forecast will shift to a new location, and then another
one or perhaps back again in another six hours. However, it’s
still pretty easy for the public to draw the "thin line"
and see where the forecast crosses the coast, effectively making it
a landfall forecast. In my opinion, these are the most important
forecasts and need to be evaluated after each event.
Our paper evaluated the errors and found no significant
improvement in forecasts of landfall position over a 25-year period,
compared with improvements of ~1% per year for general position
forecasts in the Atlantic basin. Landfall forecasts comprise only
about 13% of all forecasts issued so our sample size was relatively
small but we are continuing this work and hope to have updated
accuracy estimates for the period of 1976-2006 by next year. The new
NOAA strategic plans no longer specifically discuss improving
hurricane landfall forecasts, but the USWRP landfall forecast goals
are still listed in announcement of federal funding opportunity for
the Joint Hurricane Testbed.
How
bad do you think this year's hurricane season will be? Are we
prepared?
The seasonal forecasts of hurricane activity seem to capture the
media’s attention and everybody and their brother are doing press
conferences about their forecast or forecast update. In 1992
Hurricane Andrew struck during a year with a seasonal forecast of
"lower than normal" activity. Speaking as a Floridian
affected by Andrew and other storms, I don’t really pay much
attention to whether it’s expected to be an active year or not—I
want to know whether Andrew is coming. The people of Florida have
experienced eight hurricanes over the last two years, North and
South Carolina had a bunch of storms from 1996-2003, and Alabama,
Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas dealt with Ivan, Katrina, and Rita
recently, so the people in those states are probably well prepared.
The places to worry about are where there have not been storms in
folks’ recent memory—probably Georgia, the southern Texas coast,
and the Atlantic coast from Maryland to Maine.
If
you are free to do so, would you tell us about your current projects?
We are continuing to work on analysis of mean wind profiles in
hurricanes to look how the surface drag coefficient changes due to
wind-wave interactions. I’m also hoping to work on the effects of
shallow water wave breaking on the mean vertical profile. We are
continuing to conduct near-real-time analyses of the surface wind
fields of hurricanes. These provide a record of events and are being
used by researchers in other fields to provide wind forcing to wave,
storm surge, insurance loss, and even ecological models. They can be
found on our 1Web
site.
Another exciting area we’ve been working on for a couple of years
now is to use our wind field analyses to provide new metrics for
hurricane intensity that are less sensitive to the estimate of the
maximum wind speed in the storm. Methods based on looking at the
contribution of kinetic energy by winds over various threshold values
associated with wind, wave, and storm surge damage show great promise
as indicators of the potential impact from a hurricane, and will
provide a more robust means of comparing intensity forecasts to the
observations.
Mark. D. Powell, PhD
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory
Hurricane Research Division
Miami, FL, USA
The opinions in this interview are
those of Mark Powell and not to be construed as official NOAA
viewpoints.
|
ESI Special
Topics: September 2006
Citing URL: http://esi-topics.com/tropical/interviews/MarkPowell.html
|
|